third_party/llvm-project/lldb/www/SB-api-coding-rules.html - cobalt - Git at Google

 <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
 <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
 <head>
 <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
 <link href="style.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
 <title>LLDB Tutorial</title>
 </head>

 <body>
     <div class="www_title">
       The SB API Coding Rules
     </div>

 <div id="container">
 	<div id="content">
          <!--#include virtual="sidebar.incl"-->
 		<div id="middle">
 			<div class="post">
 				<h1 class ="postheader">SB API Coding Rules</h1>
 				<div class="postcontent">


                                   <p>The SB APIs constitute the stable C++ API that lldb presents to external clients,
                                     and which get processed by SWIG to produce the Python bindings to lldb.  As such
                                     it is important that they not suffer from the binary incompatibilities that C++ is
                                     so susceptible to.  We've established a few rules to ensure that this happens.

                                   <p>The classes in the SB API's are all called SB&lt;SomeName&gt;, where SomeName is in CamelCase
                                       starting with an upper case letter.  The method names are all CamelCase with initial
                                       capital letter as well.

                                       <p>All the SB API classes are non-virtual, single inheritance classes.  They should only include
                                         SBDefines.h or other SB headers as needed.  There should be no inlined method implementations
                                         in the header files, they should all be in the implementation files.  And there should be no
                                         direct ivar access.

                                       <p>You also need to choose the ivars for the class with care, since you can't add or remove ivars
                                         without breaking binary compatibility.  In some cases, the SB class is a thin wrapper around
                                         an internal lldb_private object.  In that case, the class can have a single ivar, which is
                                         either a pointer, shared_ptr or unique_ptr to the object in the lldb_private API.  All the
                                         lldb_private classes that get used this way are declared as opaque classes in lldb_forward.h,
                                         which is included in SBDefines.h.  So if you need an SB class to wrap an lldb_private class
                                         that isn't in lldb_forward.h, add it there rather than making a direct opaque declaration in
                                         the SB classes .h file.

                                       <p>If the SB Class needs some state of its own, as well as the backing object, don't include that
                                         as a direct ivar in the SB Class.  Instead, make an Impl class in the SB's .cpp file, and then
                                         make the SB object hold a shared or unique pointer to the Impl object.  The theory behind this is
                                         that if you need more state in the SB object, those needs are likely to change over time,
                                         and this way the Impl class can pick up members without changing the size of the object.
                                         An example of this is the SBValue class.  Please note that you should not put this Impl class
                                         in the lldb namespace.  Failure to do so leads to leakage of weak-linked symbols in the SBAPI.

                                       <p>In order to fit into the Python API's, we need to be able to default construct all the SB objects.
                                         Since the ivars of the classes are all pointers of one sort or other, this can easily be done, but
                                         it means all the methods must be prepared to handle their opaque implementation pointer being
                                         empty, and doing something reasonable.  We also always have an "IsValid" method on all the SB
                                         classes to report whether the object is empty or not.

                                       <p>Another piece of the SB API infrastructure is the Python (or other script interpreter) customization.
                                         SWIG allows you to add property access, iterators and documentation to classes, but to do that you have to use
                                         a Swig interface file in place of the .h file. Those files have a different format than a straight C++ header file.  These
                                         files are called SB&lt;ClassName&gt;.i, and live in "scripts/interface".  They are constructed by
                                         starting with the associated .h file, and adding documentation and the Python decorations, etc.  We
                                         do this in a decidedly low-tech way, by maintaining the two files in parallel.  That simplifies the
                                         build process, but it does mean that if you add a method to the C++ API's for an SB class, you have
                                         to copy the interface to the .i file.
 </div>
 </body>
 </html>
	<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
	<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<head>
	<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
	<link href="style.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
	<title>LLDB Tutorial</title>
	</head>

	<body>
	<div class="www_title">
	The SB API Coding Rules
	</div>

	<div id="container">
	<div id="content">
	<!--#include virtual="sidebar.incl"-->
	<div id="middle">
	<div class="post">
	<h1 class ="postheader">SB API Coding Rules</h1>
	<div class="postcontent">


	<p>The SB APIs constitute the stable C++ API that lldb presents to external clients,
	and which get processed by SWIG to produce the Python bindings to lldb. As such
	it is important that they not suffer from the binary incompatibilities that C++ is
	so susceptible to. We've established a few rules to ensure that this happens.

	<p>The classes in the SB API's are all called SB<SomeName>, where SomeName is in CamelCase
	starting with an upper case letter. The method names are all CamelCase with initial
	capital letter as well.

	<p>All the SB API classes are non-virtual, single inheritance classes. They should only include
	SBDefines.h or other SB headers as needed. There should be no inlined method implementations
	in the header files, they should all be in the implementation files. And there should be no
	direct ivar access.

	<p>You also need to choose the ivars for the class with care, since you can't add or remove ivars
	without breaking binary compatibility. In some cases, the SB class is a thin wrapper around
	an internal lldb_private object. In that case, the class can have a single ivar, which is
	either a pointer, shared_ptr or unique_ptr to the object in the lldb_private API. All the
	lldb_private classes that get used this way are declared as opaque classes in lldb_forward.h,
	which is included in SBDefines.h. So if you need an SB class to wrap an lldb_private class
	that isn't in lldb_forward.h, add it there rather than making a direct opaque declaration in
	the SB classes .h file.

	<p>If the SB Class needs some state of its own, as well as the backing object, don't include that
	as a direct ivar in the SB Class. Instead, make an Impl class in the SB's .cpp file, and then
	make the SB object hold a shared or unique pointer to the Impl object. The theory behind this is
	that if you need more state in the SB object, those needs are likely to change over time,
	and this way the Impl class can pick up members without changing the size of the object.
	An example of this is the SBValue class. Please note that you should not put this Impl class
	in the lldb namespace. Failure to do so leads to leakage of weak-linked symbols in the SBAPI.

	<p>In order to fit into the Python API's, we need to be able to default construct all the SB objects.
	Since the ivars of the classes are all pointers of one sort or other, this can easily be done, but
	it means all the methods must be prepared to handle their opaque implementation pointer being
	empty, and doing something reasonable. We also always have an "IsValid" method on all the SB
	classes to report whether the object is empty or not.

	<p>Another piece of the SB API infrastructure is the Python (or other script interpreter) customization.
	SWIG allows you to add property access, iterators and documentation to classes, but to do that you have to use
	a Swig interface file in place of the .h file. Those files have a different format than a straight C++ header file. These
	files are called SB<ClassName>.i, and live in "scripts/interface". They are constructed by
	starting with the associated .h file, and adding documentation and the Python decorations, etc. We
	do this in a decidedly low-tech way, by maintaining the two files in parallel. That simplifies the
	build process, but it does mean that if you add a method to the C++ API's for an SB class, you have
	to copy the interface to the .i file.
	</div>
	</body>
	</html>