src/third_party/llvm-project/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines-avoid-goto.rst

.. title:: clang-tidy - cppcoreguidelines-avoid-goto

cppcoreguidelines-avoid-goto
============================

The usage of ``goto`` for control flow is error prone and should be replaced
with looping constructs. Only forward jumps in nested loops are accepted.

This check implements `ES.76 <https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#es76-avoid-goto>`_ 
from the CppCoreGuidelines and 
`6.3.1 from High Integrity C++ <http://www.codingstandard.com/rule/6-3-1-ensure-that-the-labels-for-a-jump-statement-or-a-switch-condition-appear-later-in-the-same-or-an-enclosing-block/>`_.

For more information on why to avoid programming 
with ``goto`` you can read the famous paper `A Case against the GO TO Statement. <https://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/ewd02xx/EWD215.PDF>`_.

The check diagnoses ``goto`` for backward jumps in every language mode. These
should be replaced with `C/C++` looping constructs.

.. code-block:: c++

  // Bad, handwritten for loop.
  int i = 0;
  // Jump label for the loop
  loop_start:
  do_some_operation();

  if (i < 100) {
    ++i;
    goto loop_start;
  }

  // Better
  for(int i = 0; i < 100; ++i)
    do_some_operation();

Modern C++ needs ``goto`` only to jump out of nested loops.

.. code-block:: c++

  for(int i = 0; i < 100; ++i) {
    for(int j = 0; j < 100; ++j) {
      if (i * j > 500)
        goto early_exit;
    }
  }

  early_exit:
  some_operation();

All other uses of ``goto`` are diagnosed in `C++`.