blob: b681253ae016f235930c439503b4a65ef49b3fa2 [file] [log] [blame]
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>child-src-blocked</title>
<script src="/resources/testharness.js"></script>
<script src="/resources/testharnessreport.js"></script>
<script src='../support/logTest.sub.js?logs=["PASS IFrame %231 generated a load event."]'></script>
<script>
window.addEventListener("message", function(event) {
alert_assert(event.data);
}, false);
function alert_assert(msg) {
t_log.step(function() {
if (msg.match(/^FAIL/i)) {
assert_unreached(msg);
t_log.done();
}
for (var i = 0; i < expected_alerts.length; i++) {
if (expected_alerts[i] == msg) {
assert_true(expected_alerts[i] == msg);
expected_alerts.splice(i, 1);
if (expected_alerts.length == 0) {
t_log.done();
}
return;
}
}
assert_unreached('unexpected alert: ' + msg);
t_log.done();
});
}
</script>
<!-- enforcing policy:
frame-src 'none'; child-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; connect-src 'self';
-->
<p>
A more permissive child-src should not relax restrictions from a less-
permissive frame-src. Directives still combine for least privilege, even when
one obsoletes another.
</p>
<script>
window.wasPostTestScriptParsed = true;
var loads = 0;
function loadEvent() {
loads++;
log("PASS " + "IFrame #" + loads + " generated a load event.");
}
</script>
</head>
<body>
<iframe src="/content-security-policy/blink-contrib/resources/postmessage-fail.html" onload="loadEvent()" onerror="log('FAIL')"></iframe>
<div id="log"></div>
<script async defer src="../support/checkReport.sub.js?reportExists=true&amp;reportField=violated-directive&amp;reportValue=frame-src%20&apos;none&apos;"></script>
</body>
</html>