| // ES5 15.1.2.2 step 1 |
| |
| /* |
| * Boundary testing for super-large positive numbers between non-exponential |
| * and in-exponential-form. |
| * |
| * NB: While 1e21 is exactly representable as an IEEE754 double-precision |
| * number, its nearest neighboring representable values are a good distance |
| * away, 65536 to be precise. |
| */ |
| |
| // This is the boundary in theory. |
| assertEq(parseInt(1e21), 1); |
| |
| // This is the boundary in practice. |
| assertEq(parseInt(1e21 - 65537) > 1e20, true); |
| assertEq(parseInt(1e21 - 65536), 1); |
| assertEq(parseInt(1e21 + 65536), 1); |
| |
| // Check that we understand floating point accuracy near the boundary |
| assertEq(1e21 - 65537 !== 1e21 - 65536, true); |
| assertEq(1e21 - 65536, 1e21); |
| assertEq(1e21 + 65535, 1e21); |
| assertEq(1e21 + 65536, 1e21); |
| |
| // ES5 leaves exact precision in ToString(bigMagNum) undefined, which |
| // might make this value inconsistent across implementations (maybe, |
| // nobody's done the math here). Regardless, it's definitely a number |
| // very close to 1, and not a large-magnitude positive number. |
| assertEq(1e21 + 65537 !== 1e21, true); |
| assertEq(parseInt(1e21 + 65537) < 1.001, true); |
| |
| |
| /* |
| * Now do the same tests for super-large negative numbers crossing the |
| * opposite boundary. |
| */ |
| |
| // This is the boundary in theory. |
| assertEq(parseInt(-1e21), -1); |
| |
| // This is the boundary in practice. |
| assertEq(parseInt(-1e21 + 65537) < -1e20, true); |
| assertEq(parseInt(-1e21 + 65536), -1); |
| assertEq(parseInt(-1e21 - 65536), -1); |
| |
| // Check that we understand floating point accuracy near the boundary |
| assertEq(-1e21 + 65537 !== -1e21 + 65536, true); |
| assertEq(-1e21 + 65536, -1e21); |
| assertEq(-1e21 - 65535, -1e21); |
| assertEq(-1e21 - 65536, -1e21); |
| |
| // ES5 leaves exact precision in ToString(bigMagNum) undefined, which |
| // might make this value inconsistent across implementations (maybe, |
| // nobody's done the math here). Regardless, it's definitely a number |
| // very close to -1, and not a large-magnitude negative number. |
| assertEq(-1e21 - 65537 !== 1e21, true); |
| assertEq(parseInt(-1e21 - 65537) > -1.001, true); |
| |
| |
| /* Check values around the boundary. */ |
| arr = [1e0, 5e1, 9e19, 0.1e20, 1.3e20, 1e20, 9e20, 9.99e20, 0.1e21, |
| 1e21, 1.0e21, 2e21, 2e20, 2.1e22, 9e21, 0.1e22, 1e22, 3e46, 3e23, 3e100, 3.4e200, 7e1000, |
| 1e21, 1e21+65537, 1e21+65536, 1e21-65536, 1e21-65537]; |
| |
| /* Check across a range of values in case we missed anything. */ |
| for (var i = 0; i < 4000; i++) { |
| arr.push(1e19 + i*1e19); |
| } |
| |
| for (var i in arr) { |
| assertEq(parseInt( arr[i]), parseInt(String( arr[i]))); |
| assertEq(parseInt(-arr[i]), parseInt(String(-arr[i]))); |
| } |
| |
| |