blob: a6a93bde716f32d291aca3c5e823b16113c08b48 [file] [log] [blame]
# Copyright (C) 2010 Chris Jerdonek (chris.jerdonek@gmail.com)
#
# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
# modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
# are met:
# 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
# notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
# 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
# notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
# documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
#
# THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY APPLE INC. AND ITS CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND ANY
# EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED
# WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE
# DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL APPLE INC. OR ITS CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY
# DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES
# (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES;
# LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON
# ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
# (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS
# SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
"""Unit tests for filter.py."""
import unittest
from webkitpy.style.filter import _CategoryFilter as CategoryFilter
from webkitpy.style.filter import validate_filter_rules
from webkitpy.style.filter import FilterConfiguration
# On Testing __eq__() and __ne__():
#
# In the tests below, we deliberately do not use assertEqual() or
# assertNotEquals() to test __eq__() or __ne__(). We do this to be
# very explicit about what we are testing, especially in the case
# of assertNotEquals().
#
# Part of the reason is that it is not immediately clear what
# expression the unittest module uses to assert "not equals" -- the
# negation of __eq__() or __ne__(), which are not necessarily
# equivalent expressions in Python. For example, from Python's "Data
# Model" documentation--
#
# "There are no implied relationships among the comparison
# operators. The truth of x==y does not imply that x!=y is
# false. Accordingly, when defining __eq__(), one should
# also define __ne__() so that the operators will behave as
# expected."
#
# (from http://docs.python.org/reference/datamodel.html#object.__ne__ )
class ValidateFilterRulesTest(unittest.TestCase):
"""Tests validate_filter_rules() function."""
def test_validate_filter_rules(self):
all_categories = ["tabs", "whitespace", "build/include"]
bad_rules = [
"tabs",
"*tabs",
" tabs",
" +tabs",
"+whitespace/newline",
"+xxx",
]
good_rules = [
"+tabs",
"-tabs",
"+build"
]
for rule in bad_rules:
self.assertRaises(ValueError, validate_filter_rules,
[rule], all_categories)
for rule in good_rules:
# This works: no error.
validate_filter_rules([rule], all_categories)
class CategoryFilterTest(unittest.TestCase):
"""Tests CategoryFilter class."""
def test_init(self):
"""Test __init__ method."""
# Test that the attributes are getting set correctly.
filter = CategoryFilter(["+"])
self.assertEqual(["+"], filter._filter_rules)
def test_init_default_arguments(self):
"""Test __init__ method default arguments."""
filter = CategoryFilter()
self.assertEqual([], filter._filter_rules)
def test_str(self):
"""Test __str__ "to string" operator."""
filter = CategoryFilter(["+a", "-b"])
self.assertEqual(str(filter), "+a,-b")
def test_eq(self):
"""Test __eq__ equality function."""
filter1 = CategoryFilter(["+a", "+b"])
filter2 = CategoryFilter(["+a", "+b"])
filter3 = CategoryFilter(["+b", "+a"])
# See the notes at the top of this module about testing
# __eq__() and __ne__().
self.assertTrue(filter1.__eq__(filter2))
self.assertFalse(filter1.__eq__(filter3))
def test_ne(self):
"""Test __ne__ inequality function."""
# By default, __ne__ always returns true on different objects.
# Thus, just check the distinguishing case to verify that the
# code defines __ne__.
#
# Also, see the notes at the top of this module about testing
# __eq__() and __ne__().
self.assertFalse(CategoryFilter().__ne__(CategoryFilter()))
def test_should_check(self):
"""Test should_check() method."""
filter = CategoryFilter()
self.assertTrue(filter.should_check("everything"))
# Check a second time to exercise cache.
self.assertTrue(filter.should_check("everything"))
filter = CategoryFilter(["-"])
self.assertFalse(filter.should_check("anything"))
# Check a second time to exercise cache.
self.assertFalse(filter.should_check("anything"))
filter = CategoryFilter(["-", "+ab"])
self.assertTrue(filter.should_check("abc"))
self.assertFalse(filter.should_check("a"))
filter = CategoryFilter(["+", "-ab"])
self.assertFalse(filter.should_check("abc"))
self.assertTrue(filter.should_check("a"))
class FilterConfigurationTest(unittest.TestCase):
"""Tests FilterConfiguration class."""
def _config(self, base_rules, path_specific, user_rules):
"""Return a FilterConfiguration instance."""
return FilterConfiguration(base_rules=base_rules,
path_specific=path_specific,
user_rules=user_rules)
def test_init(self):
"""Test __init__ method."""
# Test that the attributes are getting set correctly.
# We use parameter values that are different from the defaults.
base_rules = ["-"]
path_specific = [(["path"], ["+a"])]
user_rules = ["+"]
config = self._config(base_rules, path_specific, user_rules)
self.assertEqual(base_rules, config._base_rules)
self.assertEqual(path_specific, config._path_specific)
self.assertEqual(user_rules, config._user_rules)
def test_default_arguments(self):
# Test that the attributes are getting set correctly to the defaults.
config = FilterConfiguration()
self.assertEqual([], config._base_rules)
self.assertEqual([], config._path_specific)
self.assertEqual([], config._user_rules)
def test_eq(self):
"""Test __eq__ method."""
# See the notes at the top of this module about testing
# __eq__() and __ne__().
self.assertTrue(FilterConfiguration().__eq__(FilterConfiguration()))
# Verify that a difference in any argument causes equality to fail.
config = FilterConfiguration()
# These parameter values are different from the defaults.
base_rules = ["-"]
path_specific = [(["path"], ["+a"])]
user_rules = ["+"]
self.assertFalse(config.__eq__(FilterConfiguration(
base_rules=base_rules)))
self.assertFalse(config.__eq__(FilterConfiguration(
path_specific=path_specific)))
self.assertFalse(config.__eq__(FilterConfiguration(
user_rules=user_rules)))
def test_ne(self):
"""Test __ne__ method."""
# By default, __ne__ always returns true on different objects.
# Thus, just check the distinguishing case to verify that the
# code defines __ne__.
#
# Also, see the notes at the top of this module about testing
# __eq__() and __ne__().
self.assertFalse(FilterConfiguration().__ne__(FilterConfiguration()))
def test_base_rules(self):
"""Test effect of base_rules on should_check()."""
base_rules = ["-b"]
path_specific = []
user_rules = []
config = self._config(base_rules, path_specific, user_rules)
self.assertTrue(config.should_check("a", "path"))
self.assertFalse(config.should_check("b", "path"))
def test_path_specific(self):
"""Test effect of path_rules_specifier on should_check()."""
base_rules = ["-"]
path_specific = [(["path1"], ["+b"]),
(["path2"], ["+c"])]
user_rules = []
config = self._config(base_rules, path_specific, user_rules)
self.assertFalse(config.should_check("c", "path1"))
self.assertTrue(config.should_check("c", "path2"))
# Test that first match takes precedence.
self.assertFalse(config.should_check("c", "path2/path1"))
def test_path_with_different_case(self):
"""Test a path that differs only in case."""
base_rules = ["-"]
path_specific = [(["Foo/"], ["+whitespace"])]
user_rules = []
config = self._config(base_rules, path_specific, user_rules)
self.assertFalse(config.should_check("whitespace", "Fooo/bar.txt"))
self.assertTrue(config.should_check("whitespace", "Foo/bar.txt"))
# Test different case.
self.assertTrue(config.should_check("whitespace", "FOO/bar.txt"))
def test_user_rules(self):
"""Test effect of user_rules on should_check()."""
base_rules = ["-"]
path_specific = []
user_rules = ["+b"]
config = self._config(base_rules, path_specific, user_rules)
self.assertFalse(config.should_check("a", "path"))
self.assertTrue(config.should_check("b", "path"))