| //===- unittests/Driver/MultilibTest.cpp --- Multilib tests ---------------===// |
| // |
| // The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure |
| // |
| // This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source |
| // License. See LICENSE.TXT for details. |
| // |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// |
| // |
| // Unit tests for Multilib and MultilibSet |
| // |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// |
| |
| #include "clang/Driver/Multilib.h" |
| #include "clang/Basic/LLVM.h" |
| #include "llvm/ADT/StringRef.h" |
| #include "llvm/ADT/StringSwitch.h" |
| #include "gtest/gtest.h" |
| |
| using namespace clang::driver; |
| using namespace clang; |
| |
| TEST(MultilibTest, MultilibValidity) { |
| |
| ASSERT_TRUE(Multilib().isValid()) << "Empty multilib is not valid"; |
| |
| ASSERT_TRUE(Multilib().flag("+foo").isValid()) |
| << "Single indicative flag is not valid"; |
| |
| ASSERT_TRUE(Multilib().flag("-foo").isValid()) |
| << "Single contraindicative flag is not valid"; |
| |
| ASSERT_FALSE(Multilib().flag("+foo").flag("-foo").isValid()) |
| << "Conflicting flags should invalidate the Multilib"; |
| |
| ASSERT_TRUE(Multilib().flag("+foo").flag("+foo").isValid()) |
| << "Multilib should be valid even if it has the same flag twice"; |
| |
| ASSERT_TRUE(Multilib().flag("+foo").flag("-foobar").isValid()) |
| << "Seemingly conflicting prefixes shouldn't actually conflict"; |
| } |
| |
| TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqReflexivity1) { |
| Multilib M; |
| ASSERT_TRUE(M == M) << "Multilib::operator==() is not reflexive"; |
| } |
| |
| TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqReflexivity2) { |
| ASSERT_TRUE(Multilib() == Multilib()) |
| << "Separately constructed default multilibs are not equal"; |
| } |
| |
| TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqReflexivity3) { |
| Multilib M1, M2; |
| M1.flag("+foo"); |
| M2.flag("+foo"); |
| ASSERT_TRUE(M1 == M2) << "Multilibs with the same flag should be the same"; |
| } |
| |
| TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqInequivalence1) { |
| Multilib M1, M2; |
| M1.flag("+foo"); |
| M2.flag("-foo"); |
| ASSERT_FALSE(M1 == M2) << "Multilibs with conflicting flags are not the same"; |
| ASSERT_FALSE(M2 == M1) |
| << "Multilibs with conflicting flags are not the same (commuted)"; |
| } |
| |
| TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqInequivalence2) { |
| Multilib M1, M2; |
| M2.flag("+foo"); |
| ASSERT_FALSE(M1 == M2) << "Flags make Multilibs different"; |
| } |
| |
| TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqEquivalence1) { |
| Multilib M1, M2; |
| M1.flag("+foo"); |
| M2.flag("+foo").flag("+foo"); |
| ASSERT_TRUE(M1 == M2) << "Flag duplication shouldn't affect equivalence"; |
| ASSERT_TRUE(M2 == M1) |
| << "Flag duplication shouldn't affect equivalence (commuted)"; |
| } |
| |
| TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqEquivalence2) { |
| Multilib M1("64"); |
| Multilib M2; |
| M2.gccSuffix("/64"); |
| ASSERT_TRUE(M1 == M2) |
| << "Constructor argument must match Multilib::gccSuffix()"; |
| ASSERT_TRUE(M2 == M1) |
| << "Constructor argument must match Multilib::gccSuffix() (commuted)"; |
| } |
| |
| TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqEquivalence3) { |
| Multilib M1("", "32"); |
| Multilib M2; |
| M2.osSuffix("/32"); |
| ASSERT_TRUE(M1 == M2) |
| << "Constructor argument must match Multilib::osSuffix()"; |
| ASSERT_TRUE(M2 == M1) |
| << "Constructor argument must match Multilib::osSuffix() (commuted)"; |
| } |
| |
| TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqEquivalence4) { |
| Multilib M1("", "", "16"); |
| Multilib M2; |
| M2.includeSuffix("/16"); |
| ASSERT_TRUE(M1 == M2) |
| << "Constructor argument must match Multilib::includeSuffix()"; |
| ASSERT_TRUE(M2 == M1) |
| << "Constructor argument must match Multilib::includeSuffix() (commuted)"; |
| } |
| |
| TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqInequivalence3) { |
| Multilib M1("foo"); |
| Multilib M2("bar"); |
| ASSERT_FALSE(M1 == M2) << "Differing gccSuffixes should be different"; |
| ASSERT_FALSE(M2 == M1) |
| << "Differing gccSuffixes should be different (commuted)"; |
| } |
| |
| TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqInequivalence4) { |
| Multilib M1("", "foo"); |
| Multilib M2("", "bar"); |
| ASSERT_FALSE(M1 == M2) << "Differing osSuffixes should be different"; |
| ASSERT_FALSE(M2 == M1) |
| << "Differing osSuffixes should be different (commuted)"; |
| } |
| |
| TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqInequivalence5) { |
| Multilib M1("", "", "foo"); |
| Multilib M2("", "", "bar"); |
| ASSERT_FALSE(M1 == M2) << "Differing includeSuffixes should be different"; |
| ASSERT_FALSE(M2 == M1) |
| << "Differing includeSuffixes should be different (commuted)"; |
| } |
| |
| TEST(MultilibTest, Construction1) { |
| Multilib M("gcc64", "os64", "inc64"); |
| ASSERT_TRUE(M.gccSuffix() == "/gcc64"); |
| ASSERT_TRUE(M.osSuffix() == "/os64"); |
| ASSERT_TRUE(M.includeSuffix() == "/inc64"); |
| } |
| |
| TEST(MultilibTest, Construction2) { |
| Multilib M1; |
| Multilib M2(""); |
| Multilib M3("", ""); |
| Multilib M4("", "", ""); |
| ASSERT_TRUE(M1 == M2) |
| << "Default arguments to Multilib constructor broken (first argument)"; |
| ASSERT_TRUE(M1 == M3) |
| << "Default arguments to Multilib constructor broken (second argument)"; |
| ASSERT_TRUE(M1 == M4) |
| << "Default arguments to Multilib constructor broken (third argument)"; |
| } |
| |
| TEST(MultilibTest, Construction3) { |
| Multilib M = Multilib().flag("+f1").flag("+f2").flag("-f3"); |
| for (Multilib::flags_list::const_iterator I = M.flags().begin(), |
| E = M.flags().end(); |
| I != E; ++I) { |
| ASSERT_TRUE(llvm::StringSwitch<bool>(*I) |
| .Cases("+f1", "+f2", "-f3", true) |
| .Default(false)); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| static bool hasFlag(const Multilib &M, StringRef Flag) { |
| for (Multilib::flags_list::const_iterator I = M.flags().begin(), |
| E = M.flags().end(); |
| I != E; ++I) { |
| if (*I == Flag) |
| return true; |
| else if (StringRef(*I).substr(1) == Flag.substr(1)) |
| return false; |
| } |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| TEST(MultilibTest, SetConstruction1) { |
| // Single maybe |
| MultilibSet MS; |
| ASSERT_TRUE(MS.size() == 0); |
| MS.Maybe(Multilib("64").flag("+m64")); |
| ASSERT_TRUE(MS.size() == 2); |
| for (MultilibSet::const_iterator I = MS.begin(), E = MS.end(); I != E; ++I) { |
| if (I->gccSuffix() == "/64") |
| ASSERT_TRUE(I->flags()[0] == "+m64"); |
| else if (I->gccSuffix() == "") |
| ASSERT_TRUE(I->flags()[0] == "-m64"); |
| else |
| FAIL() << "Unrecognized gccSufix: " << I->gccSuffix(); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| TEST(MultilibTest, SetConstruction2) { |
| // Double maybe |
| MultilibSet MS; |
| MS.Maybe(Multilib("sof").flag("+sof")); |
| MS.Maybe(Multilib("el").flag("+EL")); |
| ASSERT_TRUE(MS.size() == 4); |
| for (MultilibSet::const_iterator I = MS.begin(), E = MS.end(); I != E; ++I) { |
| ASSERT_TRUE(I->isValid()) << "Multilb " << *I << " should be valid"; |
| ASSERT_TRUE(llvm::StringSwitch<bool>(I->gccSuffix()) |
| .Cases("", "/sof", "/el", "/sof/el", true) |
| .Default(false)) |
| << "Multilib " << *I << " wasn't expected"; |
| ASSERT_TRUE(llvm::StringSwitch<bool>(I->gccSuffix()) |
| .Case("", hasFlag(*I, "-sof")) |
| .Case("/sof", hasFlag(*I, "+sof")) |
| .Case("/el", hasFlag(*I, "-sof")) |
| .Case("/sof/el", hasFlag(*I, "+sof")) |
| .Default(false)) |
| << "Multilib " << *I << " didn't have the appropriate {+,-}sof flag"; |
| ASSERT_TRUE(llvm::StringSwitch<bool>(I->gccSuffix()) |
| .Case("", hasFlag(*I, "-EL")) |
| .Case("/sof", hasFlag(*I, "-EL")) |
| .Case("/el", hasFlag(*I, "+EL")) |
| .Case("/sof/el", hasFlag(*I, "+EL")) |
| .Default(false)) |
| << "Multilib " << *I << " didn't have the appropriate {+,-}EL flag"; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| TEST(MultilibTest, SetPushback) { |
| MultilibSet MS; |
| MS.push_back(Multilib("one")); |
| MS.push_back(Multilib("two")); |
| ASSERT_TRUE(MS.size() == 2); |
| for (MultilibSet::const_iterator I = MS.begin(), E = MS.end(); I != E; ++I) { |
| ASSERT_TRUE(llvm::StringSwitch<bool>(I->gccSuffix()) |
| .Cases("/one", "/two", true) |
| .Default(false)); |
| } |
| MS.clear(); |
| ASSERT_TRUE(MS.size() == 0); |
| } |
| |
| TEST(MultilibTest, SetRegexFilter) { |
| MultilibSet MS; |
| MS.Maybe(Multilib("one")); |
| MS.Maybe(Multilib("two")); |
| MS.Maybe(Multilib("three")); |
| ASSERT_EQ(MS.size(), (unsigned)2 * 2 * 2) |
| << "Size before filter was incorrect. Contents:\n" << MS; |
| MS.FilterOut("/one/two/three"); |
| ASSERT_EQ(MS.size(), (unsigned)2 * 2 * 2 - 1) |
| << "Size after filter was incorrect. Contents:\n" << MS; |
| for (MultilibSet::const_iterator I = MS.begin(), E = MS.end(); I != E; ++I) { |
| ASSERT_TRUE(I->gccSuffix() != "/one/two/three") |
| << "The filter should have removed " << *I; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| TEST(MultilibTest, SetFilterObject) { |
| MultilibSet MS; |
| MS.Maybe(Multilib("orange")); |
| MS.Maybe(Multilib("pear")); |
| MS.Maybe(Multilib("plum")); |
| ASSERT_EQ((int)MS.size(), 1 /* Default */ + |
| 1 /* pear */ + |
| 1 /* plum */ + |
| 1 /* pear/plum */ + |
| 1 /* orange */ + |
| 1 /* orange/pear */ + |
| 1 /* orange/plum */ + |
| 1 /* orange/pear/plum */ ) |
| << "Size before filter was incorrect. Contents:\n" << MS; |
| MS.FilterOut([](const Multilib &M) { |
| return StringRef(M.gccSuffix()).startswith("/p"); |
| }); |
| ASSERT_EQ((int)MS.size(), 1 /* Default */ + |
| 1 /* orange */ + |
| 1 /* orange/pear */ + |
| 1 /* orange/plum */ + |
| 1 /* orange/pear/plum */ ) |
| << "Size after filter was incorrect. Contents:\n" << MS; |
| for (MultilibSet::const_iterator I = MS.begin(), E = MS.end(); I != E; ++I) { |
| ASSERT_FALSE(StringRef(I->gccSuffix()).startswith("/p")) |
| << "The filter should have removed " << *I; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| TEST(MultilibTest, SetSelection1) { |
| MultilibSet MS1 = MultilibSet() |
| .Maybe(Multilib("64").flag("+m64")); |
| |
| Multilib::flags_list FlagM64; |
| FlagM64.push_back("+m64"); |
| Multilib SelectionM64; |
| ASSERT_TRUE(MS1.select(FlagM64, SelectionM64)) |
| << "Flag set was {\"+m64\"}, but selection not found"; |
| ASSERT_TRUE(SelectionM64.gccSuffix() == "/64") |
| << "Selection picked " << SelectionM64 << " which was not expected"; |
| |
| Multilib::flags_list FlagNoM64; |
| FlagNoM64.push_back("-m64"); |
| Multilib SelectionNoM64; |
| ASSERT_TRUE(MS1.select(FlagNoM64, SelectionNoM64)) |
| << "Flag set was {\"-m64\"}, but selection not found"; |
| ASSERT_TRUE(SelectionNoM64.gccSuffix() == "") |
| << "Selection picked " << SelectionNoM64 << " which was not expected"; |
| } |
| |
| TEST(MultilibTest, SetSelection2) { |
| MultilibSet MS2 = MultilibSet() |
| .Maybe(Multilib("el").flag("+EL")) |
| .Maybe(Multilib("sf").flag("+SF")); |
| |
| for (unsigned I = 0; I < 4; ++I) { |
| bool IsEL = I & 0x1; |
| bool IsSF = I & 0x2; |
| Multilib::flags_list Flags; |
| if (IsEL) |
| Flags.push_back("+EL"); |
| else |
| Flags.push_back("-EL"); |
| |
| if (IsSF) |
| Flags.push_back("+SF"); |
| else |
| Flags.push_back("-SF"); |
| |
| Multilib Selection; |
| ASSERT_TRUE(MS2.select(Flags, Selection)) << "Selection failed for " |
| << (IsEL ? "+EL" : "-EL") << " " |
| << (IsSF ? "+SF" : "-SF"); |
| |
| std::string Suffix; |
| if (IsEL) |
| Suffix += "/el"; |
| if (IsSF) |
| Suffix += "/sf"; |
| |
| ASSERT_EQ(Selection.gccSuffix(), Suffix) << "Selection picked " << Selection |
| << " which was not expected "; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| TEST(MultilibTest, SetCombineWith) { |
| MultilibSet Coffee; |
| Coffee.push_back(Multilib("coffee")); |
| MultilibSet Milk; |
| Milk.push_back(Multilib("milk")); |
| MultilibSet Latte; |
| ASSERT_EQ(Latte.size(), (unsigned)0); |
| Latte.combineWith(Coffee); |
| ASSERT_EQ(Latte.size(), (unsigned)1); |
| Latte.combineWith(Milk); |
| ASSERT_EQ(Latte.size(), (unsigned)2); |
| } |