| // RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,unix.Malloc,debug.ExprInspection -analyzer-config max-nodes=12 -verify %s |
| |
| // Here we test how "suppress on sink" feature of certain bugtypes interacts |
| // with reaching analysis limits. |
| |
| // If we report a warning of a bug-type with "suppress on sink" attribute set |
| // (such as MallocChecker's memory leak warning), then failing to reach the |
| // reason for the sink (eg. no-return function such as "exit()") due to analysis |
| // limits (eg. max-nodes option), we may produce a false positive. |
| |
| typedef __typeof(sizeof(int)) size_t; |
| void *malloc(size_t); |
| |
| extern void exit(int) __attribute__ ((__noreturn__)); |
| |
| void clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(void); |
| |
| int coin(); |
| |
| void test_single_cfg_block_sink() { |
| void *p = malloc(1); // no-warning (wherever the leak warning may occur here) |
| |
| // Due to max-nodes option in the run line, we should reach the first call |
| // but bail out before the second call. |
| // If the test on these two lines starts failing, see if modifying |
| // the max-nodes run-line helps. |
| clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(); // expected-warning{{REACHABLE}} |
| clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(); // no-warning |
| |
| // Even though we do not reach this line, we should still suppress |
| // the leak report. |
| exit(0); |
| } |
| |
| // A similar test with more complicated control flow before the no-return thing, |
| // so that the no-return thing wasn't in the same CFG block. |
| void test_more_complex_control_flow_before_sink() { |
| void *p = malloc(1); // no-warning |
| |
| clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(); // expected-warning{{REACHABLE}} |
| clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(); // no-warning |
| |
| if (coin()) |
| exit(0); |
| else |
| exit(1); |
| } |
| |
| // A loop before the no-return function, to make sure that |
| // the dominated-by-sink analysis doesn't hang. |
| void test_loop_before_sink(int n) { |
| void *p = malloc(1); // no-warning |
| |
| clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(); // expected-warning{{REACHABLE}} |
| clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(); // no-warning |
| |
| for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) { |
| } |
| exit(1); |
| } |
| |
| // We're not sure if this is no-return. |
| void test_loop_with_sink(int n) { |
| void *p = malloc(1); // expected-warning@+2{{Potential leak of memory}} |
| |
| clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(); // expected-warning{{REACHABLE}} |
| clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(); // no-warning |
| |
| for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) |
| if (i == 0) |
| exit(1); |
| } |
| |
| // Handle unreachable blocks correctly. |
| void test_unreachable_successor_blocks() { |
| void *p = malloc(1); // no-warning |
| |
| clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(); // expected-warning{{REACHABLE}} |
| clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(); // no-warning |
| |
| if (1) // no-crash |
| exit(1); |
| } |