| // RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,debug.ExprInspection -verify %s |
| |
| // Tests for c11 atomics. Many of these tests currently yield unknown |
| // because we don't fully model the atomics and instead imprecisely |
| // treat their arguments as escaping. |
| |
| typedef unsigned int uint32_t; |
| typedef enum memory_order { |
| memory_order_relaxed = __ATOMIC_RELAXED, |
| memory_order_consume = __ATOMIC_CONSUME, |
| memory_order_acquire = __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE, |
| memory_order_release = __ATOMIC_RELEASE, |
| memory_order_acq_rel = __ATOMIC_ACQ_REL, |
| memory_order_seq_cst = __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST |
| } memory_order; |
| |
| void clang_analyzer_eval(int); |
| |
| struct RefCountedStruct { |
| uint32_t refCount; |
| void *ptr; |
| }; |
| |
| void test_atomic_fetch_add(struct RefCountedStruct *s) { |
| s->refCount = 1; |
| |
| uint32_t result = __c11_atomic_fetch_add((volatile _Atomic(uint32_t) *)&s->refCount,- 1, memory_order_relaxed); |
| |
| // When we model atomics fully this should (probably) be FALSE. It should never |
| // be TRUE (because the operation mutates the passed in storage). |
| clang_analyzer_eval(s->refCount == 1); // expected-warning {{UNKNOWN}} |
| |
| // When fully modeled this should be TRUE |
| clang_analyzer_eval(result == 1); // expected-warning {{UNKNOWN}} |
| } |
| |
| void test_atomic_load(struct RefCountedStruct *s) { |
| s->refCount = 1; |
| |
| uint32_t result = __c11_atomic_load((volatile _Atomic(uint32_t) *)&s->refCount, memory_order_relaxed); |
| |
| // When we model atomics fully this should (probably) be TRUE. |
| clang_analyzer_eval(s->refCount == 1); // expected-warning {{UNKNOWN}} |
| |
| // When fully modeled this should be TRUE |
| clang_analyzer_eval(result == 1); // expected-warning {{UNKNOWN}} |
| } |
| |
| void test_atomic_store(struct RefCountedStruct *s) { |
| s->refCount = 1; |
| |
| __c11_atomic_store((volatile _Atomic(uint32_t) *)&s->refCount, 2, memory_order_relaxed); |
| |
| // When we model atomics fully this should (probably) be FALSE. It should never |
| // be TRUE (because the operation mutates the passed in storage). |
| clang_analyzer_eval(s->refCount == 1); // expected-warning {{UNKNOWN}} |
| } |
| |
| void test_atomic_exchange(struct RefCountedStruct *s) { |
| s->refCount = 1; |
| |
| uint32_t result = __c11_atomic_exchange((volatile _Atomic(uint32_t) *)&s->refCount, 2, memory_order_relaxed); |
| |
| // When we model atomics fully this should (probably) be FALSE. It should never |
| // be TRUE (because the operation mutates the passed in storage). |
| clang_analyzer_eval(s->refCount == 1); // expected-warning {{UNKNOWN}} |
| |
| // When fully modeled this should be TRUE |
| clang_analyzer_eval(result == 1); // expected-warning {{UNKNOWN}} |
| } |
| |
| |
| void test_atomic_compare_exchange_strong(struct RefCountedStruct *s) { |
| s->refCount = 1; |
| uint32_t expected = 2; |
| uint32_t desired = 3; |
| _Bool result = __c11_atomic_compare_exchange_strong((volatile _Atomic(uint32_t) *)&s->refCount, &expected, desired, memory_order_relaxed, memory_order_relaxed); |
| |
| // For now we expect both expected and refCount to be invalidated by the |
| // call. In the future we should model more precisely. |
| clang_analyzer_eval(s->refCount == 3); // expected-warning {{UNKNOWN}} |
| clang_analyzer_eval(expected == 2); // expected-warning {{UNKNOWN}} |
| } |
| |
| void test_atomic_compare_exchange_weak(struct RefCountedStruct *s) { |
| s->refCount = 1; |
| uint32_t expected = 2; |
| uint32_t desired = 3; |
| _Bool result = __c11_atomic_compare_exchange_weak((volatile _Atomic(uint32_t) *)&s->refCount, &expected, desired, memory_order_relaxed, memory_order_relaxed); |
| |
| // For now we expect both expected and refCount to be invalidated by the |
| // call. In the future we should model more precisely. |
| clang_analyzer_eval(s->refCount == 3); // expected-warning {{UNKNOWN}} |
| clang_analyzer_eval(expected == 2); // expected-warning {{UNKNOWN}} |
| } |