| // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++98 -Wimplicit-fallthrough %s |
| // XFAIL: * |
| |
| // NOTE: This test is marked XFAIL until we come up with a good language design |
| // for a worfklow to use this warning outside of C++11. |
| |
| int fallthrough(int n) { |
| switch (n / 10) { |
| if (n - 1) { |
| n = 100; |
| } else if (n - 2) { |
| n = 101; |
| } else if (n - 3) { |
| n = 102; |
| } |
| case -1: // expected-warning{{unannotated fall-through between switch labels}} expected-note{{insert 'break;' to avoid fall-through}} |
| ; |
| case 0: {// expected-warning{{unannotated fall-through between switch labels}} expected-note{{insert 'break;' to avoid fall-through}} |
| } |
| case 1: // expected-warning{{unannotated fall-through between switch labels}} expected-note{{insert 'break;' to avoid fall-through}} |
| n += 100 ; |
| case 3: // expected-warning{{unannotated fall-through between switch labels}} expected-note{{insert 'break;' to avoid fall-through}} |
| if (n > 0) |
| n += 200; |
| case 4: // expected-warning{{unannotated fall-through between switch labels}} expected-note{{insert 'break;' to avoid fall-through}} |
| if (n < 0) |
| ; |
| case 5: // expected-warning{{unannotated fall-through between switch labels}} expected-note{{insert 'break;' to avoid fall-through}} |
| switch (n) { |
| case 111: |
| break; |
| case 112: |
| break; |
| case 113: |
| break ; |
| } |
| case 6: // expected-warning{{unannotated fall-through between switch labels}} expected-note{{insert 'break;' to avoid fall-through}} |
| n += 300; |
| } |
| switch (n / 30) { |
| case 11: |
| case 12: // no warning here, intended fall-through, no statement between labels |
| n += 1600; |
| } |
| switch (n / 40) { |
| case 13: |
| if (n % 2 == 0) { |
| return 1; |
| } else { |
| return 2; |
| } |
| case 15: // no warning here, there's no fall-through |
| n += 3200; |
| } |
| switch (n / 50) { |
| case 17: { |
| if (n % 2 == 0) { |
| return 1; |
| } else { |
| return 2; |
| } |
| } |
| case 19: { // no warning here, there's no fall-through |
| n += 6400; |
| return 3; |
| } |
| case 21: { // no warning here, there's no fall-through |
| break; |
| } |
| case 23: // no warning here, there's no fall-through |
| n += 128000; |
| break; |
| case 25: // no warning here, there's no fall-through |
| break; |
| } |
| |
| return n; |
| } |
| |
| class ClassWithDtor { |
| public: |
| ~ClassWithDtor() {} |
| }; |
| |
| void fallthrough2(int n) { |
| switch (n) { |
| case 0: |
| { |
| ClassWithDtor temp; |
| break; |
| } |
| default: // no warning here, there's no fall-through |
| break; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| #define MY_SWITCH(X, Y, Z, U, V) switch (X) { case Y: Z; case U: V; } |
| #define MY_SWITCH2(X, Y, Z) switch (X) { Y; Z; } |
| #define MY_CASE(X, Y) case X: Y |
| #define MY_CASE2(X, Y, U, V) case X: Y; case U: V |
| |
| int fallthrough_macro1(int n) { |
| MY_SWITCH(n, 13, n *= 2, 14, break) // expected-warning{{unannotated fall-through between switch labels}} |
| |
| switch (n + 1) { |
| MY_CASE(33, n += 2); |
| MY_CASE(44, break); // expected-warning{{unannotated fall-through between switch labels}} |
| MY_CASE(55, n += 3); |
| } |
| |
| switch (n + 3) { |
| MY_CASE(333, return 333); |
| MY_CASE2(444, n += 44, 4444, break); // expected-warning{{unannotated fall-through between switch labels}} |
| MY_CASE(555, n += 33); |
| } |
| |
| MY_SWITCH2(n + 4, MY_CASE(17, n *= 3), MY_CASE(19, break)) // expected-warning{{unannotated fall-through between switch labels}} |
| |
| MY_SWITCH2(n + 5, MY_CASE(21, break), MY_CASE2(23, n *= 7, 25, break)) // expected-warning{{unannotated fall-through between switch labels}} |
| |
| return n; |
| } |